Additional Case 6.3
MedEquip, a medical services company with 500 employees, has experienced an
extensive business downturn, and a layoff is necessary. MedEquip managers expect a
layoff to be problematic because the firm made verbal commitments to workers for
lifetime employment. You are an HR consultant brought in to assist with the layoff. The
firm has also hired a PR specialist to handle the press releases and public
communications about the layoff. Although MedEquip is a large company, the firm has
built a family atmosphere. Corporate headquarters is located in a small community of
about 10,000 people.
The firm is planning to implement a layoff of 20% of its hourly and managerial
employees. Because of time demands and financial pressures, the layoff will occur in
30 days. The firm plans to use work performance as the layoff criterion. Three areas of
the business will be affected: MIS, facilities, and accounting. Management is concerned
about security in these areas.
Olivia, a middle manager who will not be laid off, has decided to hold group meetings
with the units affected by the layoff. Employees will not receive information in writing
regarding the layoff to avoid litigation issues. Instead, affected employees will receive
verbal communications from Olivia about the layoff. Employees at the firm who are not
losing their jobs will receive e-mails that summarize the current situation at MedEquip.
Refer to Additional Case 6.3. Given the situation at MedEquip, which of the following
statements is most likely true?
A) MedEquip must offer laid-off employees 60 days of income to avoid WARN Act
violations.
B) MedEquip is in violation of the WARN Act and must extend the layoff deadline by
30 days.
C) MedEquip is not subject to the WARN Act because the business is not bankrupt.
D) MedEquip is not subject to the WARN because the business is too small.
Frank, a union member, is discharged by his employer for gross misconduct. When
Frank appeals the decision to his union, he is most likely seeking: