13) which of the following has been recognized by the courts as a possible justification
for tying agreements?
a.the seller is a new business in the tied product category.
b.the tying product is not available for purchase without the agreement.
c.the tying agreement involves two separate and distinct items.
d.the seller is the market leader in the tied product category.
14) joe is going on a survival hike in the desert. he goes to a sporting goods store,
describes the hike, and asks the salesman to select suitable hiking boots for him. the
boots the salesman suggests are well made and are appropriate for normal hiking, but
are not suitable for joes planned ordeal. relying on the salesmans selection, joe buys the
boots. after he suffers personal injury because the boots prove inadequate for the
survival hike, joe sues the store. joe can recover under:
a.the implied warranty of merchantability.
b.the implied warranty of fitness.
c.both the implied warranty of fitness and the implied warranty of merchantability.
d.joe cannot sue fro breach because it was his responsibility to select the boots.
15) sklar, cpa, purchased from wiz corp. two computers. sklar discovered material
defects in the computers 10 months after taking delivery. three years after discovering
the defects, sklar commenced an action for breach of warranty against wiz. wiz has
raised the statute of limitations as a defense. the original contract between wiz and sklar
contained a conspicuous clause providing that the statute of limitations for breach of
warranty actions would be limited to 18 months. under the circumstances, sklar will:
a.win because the action was commenced within the four-year period as measured from
the date of delivery.
b.win because the action was commenced within the four-year period as measured from
the time he discovered the breach or should have discovered the breach.