On June 15, 1982, Shirley Joyce Speers signed a ‘Last Will and Testament.’ It named her
husband, Ralph Speers, as her executor. It also gave her daughter, Sherry Arlene Ross,
her household furnishings and appliances, and her son, Daniel Eugene Speers, her
livestock. Her husband was named the beneficiary of the rest of the estate, provided he
paid the estate’s expenses. If he failed to do so, his share went to their children and
grandsons. The will was probably witnessed and signed, but not notarized. The
witnesses did not see any lines or strikeouts in the will when they signed it. Shirley died
on April 20, 1997, and the will was found with strike-outs that eliminated the gifts to
her husband. Which of the following occurs as a result?
a. The will is admitted to probate as it was originally executed
b. The will is admitted to probate with all the terms except those that are crossed out
c. The will cannot be admitted to probate
d. None of the above
In 1952, Ogle was the owner of two adjoining lots numbered 6 and 7 fronting at the
north on a city street. In that year, he laid out a concrete driveway along and two feet
from what he erroneously believed to be the west boundary of lot 7. Ogle used the
driveway for access to buildings situated at the southern end of both lots. Later, in 1952,
he conveyed lot 7 to Dale, and thereafter in the same year he conveyed lot 6 to Pace.
Neither deed made any reference to the driveway, and after the conveyance Dale used it
exclusively for access to lot 7. In 1976, a survey by Pace established that the driveway
encroached six inches on lot 6, and Pace brought an appropriate action to establish his
lawful ownership of the strip upon which the driveway approaches, to enjoin its use by
Dale, and to require Dale to remove the overlap. What result?
Discuss the documents necessary for the creation of a co’‘op and a condominium.