On October 29, 1989, Al Glitz agrees to paint Georgia’s house during the Thanksgiving
week for $4,000 in exchange for Georgia’s promise to pay him $4,000 in cash
immediately upon completion of the work. Which of the following statements is TRUE
with regard to this case?
A. Georgia could hire another painter on October 31 without legal liability to Al
because until he has painted the house, he has not given any consideration for Georgia’s
promise to hire him.
B. Al could back out of the deal on October 31 without legal liability to Georgia
because she has not given any consideration for Al’s promise to do the work until she
pays him.
C. Both parties are bound on October 29 because each has given consideration for the
other’s promise, and neither may back out without legal liability.
D. Al could back out of the deal on October 29 without legal liability if he could prove
that $4,000 was inadequate consideration to paint Georgia’s house.
Answer:
Under this theory, a person’s undisclosed, self-serving use of another’s information to
purchase or sell securities, in breach of a duty of loyalty and confidentiality, defrauds
the individual who provided the information.
A. The classical theory of insider trading liability.
B. The misappropriation theory of insider trading liability.
C. The fraud-on the-market theory.
D. The price disparity theory.