In old England, the crown could do no wrong, which serves as the historical source of
the doctrine of _____ immunity, holding that the government is immune from suit.
In Gonzales v. Reno the court chose to uphold the INS right to make a policy decision in
the absence of Congressional direction. They did make known that they “are not
untroubled by the degree of obedience that the INS appears to give to the wishes of
parents, especially parents who are outside of this country’s jurisdiction.” The court also
showed concern with the INS policy of not considering the communist-totalitarian state
to itself justify the consideration of Elian’s asylum petition. Ultimately, however, the
court found the INS decision not to be unreasonable. Do you believe it is possible for an
administrative agency to be able to make fair and constitutionally defendable alternative
decisions based on varying fact situations on a case-by-case basis, or must a single,
fairly rigid policy be utilized?