4) the most important example of strict liability principles in modern legislation is:
a.road safety legislations
b.environmental acts
c.disabilities acts
d.workers compensation acts
5) the state of indiana hires the reliable construction company to do some excavation
work on an interstate highway. the state lays out the general objectives that reliable has
to achieve, but the details of the job are up to reliable. the job involves digging holes ten
feet deep, the whole way, across the highway. given the nature of the job, its important
that reliable be especially careful in putting up flashers and warning signs to steer
oncoming motorists onto a detour. reliable, however, does not do an adequate job in this
regard and motorists are continually driving their cars into the construction area at high
speed. one of these drivers, tim, is unable to stop in time, and drives his car into the
hole, suffering severe personal injury and damage to his car. tim sues reliable and the
state for reliables negligence. in this case:
a.the state is liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior.
b.the state is not liable because reliable is an independent contractor.
c.the state is liable for reliables failure to take requisite special precautions.
d.the state is not liable because it was not negligent.
6) bill is 25 years old. his uncle had promised in writing to pay him $2,000 if bill would
refrain from drinking alcohol for one year. bill refrained from drinking alcohol for one
year. however, his uncle now refuses to pay bill as agreed-upon. the uncle claims that
because bill suffered no detriment by refraining from alcohol, his non-drinking does not
constitute legal consideration and therefore no contract was formed. if bill sues his
uncle, bill will:
a.win because bill had a legal right to drink alcohol.
b.lose because consideration must have monetary value.
c.win because no consideration is needed in this contract.
d.lose because refraining from an action can never be considered legal consideration.