b.valid if it is in writing.
c.against public policy.
d.valid if both parties agree.
26) ojay corp., a-c, inc., and kato co. are competitors in the production and sale of
knives. a year ago, the three firms agreed to share pricing information with each other
on a periodic basis. as a result of this agreed sharing of information, the three
companies regularly charge the same prices, including a minimum price that none of the
three goes below and a maximum price that none of the three goes above. a fourth
producer of knives, bronco co., the plaintiff in a sherman act section 1 files a lawsuit
against ojay, a-c, and kato. bronco claims in the lawsuit that the foregoing facts
constituted price-fixing and bronco suffered direct antitrust injury as a result. assuming
that bronco is a proper plaintiff, which of the following is an accurate analysis under
current antitrust law?
a.even if the defendants were involved only in conscious parallelism concerning pricing
policies, they will be held liable under section 1 because their behavior caused harm to
the plaintiff.
b.if the court believes that the evidence demonstrates an agreement to fix prices, it will
hold the defendants liable under section 1 regardless of the business justifications for
their agreement.
c.the defendants cannot be held liable under section 1, because the facts indicate that
they agreed to share pricing information without agreeing to fix prices or making any
agreement to that effect.
d.the defendants should succeed with an argument that they are not liable for any fixing
of maximum prices, because any such price-fixing would have finally benefited
consumers.
27)