Harry said to Marge, “I have a ring once owned by Marilyn Monroe. Would you like to
buy it for $500?” Marge pays for the ring, but the next day a friend tells her that Harry
had recently purchased the ring at a local department store. Marge enjoys wearing the
ring and wears it constantly for twelve months. Finally, she goes to Harry and says,
“Here is the ring you lied about. Give me my $500.” Most likely Marge will:
a. get her money back since Harry’s representation was fraudulent.
b. not get her money back since she should have investigated the facts about the ring
more carefully. c. get her money back since she is a good faith purchaser of
merchandise.
d. not get her money back since she has affirmed the contract by taking an unduly long
time to disaffirm.
A ninety-year-old patient walked away from a nursing home and wandered onto some
nearby railroad tracks. Once on the tracks, the patient stumbled and sprained his ankle.
A few minutes later a train approached. The engineer saw the man on the track and
could have stopped, but the train’s brakes were defective. As a result, the train hit and
killed the man. His family is suing the railroad for negligence. In this case:
a. the patient has assumed the risk of wandering onto the railroad tracks.
b. because the patient was contributorily negligent, most states would hold that the
railroad has no liability.
c. in states that follow the contributory negligence rule, the train had the last clear
chance to avoid the accident,
so the patient’s negligence does not bar his estate’s recovery.