Larson & Son manufactured welders that frequently malfunctioned, setting clothing on
fire and causing serious burns. Larson & Son sold all of its assets to Swenson Co.,
which continued to manufacture the Larson welder product line. Eighteen months after
Swenson’s purchase, one of Larson’s customers sued Swenson for injuries caused by a
welder purchased from Larson, one year prior to the purchase by Swenson. Under the
circumstances, Swenson Co.:
a. cannot be held liable, because it is a corporation.
b. cannot be held liable, because it did not manufacture the welder in question.
c. might be held liable in some states under strict liability.
d. could not be liable if Larson & Son still exists as a corporate entity.
Which of the following is correct with regard to treaties in the United States legal
system?
a. They have no legal effect.
b. Under the U.S. Constitution, they must be signed by the President and approved by
the U.S. Senate.
c. They have no effect on business law.
d. They must be approved by the states before they have the force of law.