ore. The ore turned out to be worthless. The court ruled that:
a. The bank had an obligation to inspect the ore before paying for the documents on
behalf of the buyer.
b. The buyer had a cause of action against the chemist for fraud.
c. The bank had acted properly in paying the seller even though the ore did not conform
to the contract because the certificate was regular on its face.
d. The bank had acted properly in paying the seller because the bill of lading was
negotiable.
Antidumping and countervailing duty cases may be appealed to the U.S. Court of
International Trade in all of the following situations except:
a. A decision by the International Trade Association not to conduct an investigation.
b. From a decision by the ITA to conduct an investigation.
c. From a final decision by the International Trade Association (ITA).
d. From a decision by the ITA to suspend an investigation.