B. Contracts conditioned on orally agreed-on terms
C. Contracts that are not final as they are part written and part oral
D. Contracts with ambiguous terms
E. All of these
Pet Pig Farm. Marcy wanted to buy Lucy’s land and use it to breed small pigs to be kept
as pets. Marcy told Lucy that having water on the property was very important. Lucy
assured her that a spring ran through one corner of the property. Therefore, Marcy
agreed to buy the farm. Although she did not ask Lucy anything about it, Marcy, who
loved pigs, assumed that the neighbors would be pleased with the pigs being in the area.
In a separate contract, Lucy also agreed to sell Marcy a used truck for $5,000. After the
contract for the land sale was entered into, it was discovered that actually the spring did
not run through the corner of Lucy’s property. The area in which the spring ran actually
belonged to a neighbor. Additionally, when Lucy brought Marcy the used truck, Marcy
said, “That’s not the truck!” It was discovered that Lucy, who had two trucks, thought
that Marcy had bought the older truck when Marcy thought she had purchased the
newer truck. Marcy was also surprised when she received a petition signed by all
surrounding landowners objecting to the presence of the pigs and threatening to sue
Marcy for nuisance. Which of the following would be the result if Marcy attempts to
rescind the contract and recover damages only on the basis of the neighbor’s objection
to a pig farm?
A. Marcy may rescind the contract and recover damages because Lucy made an implied
misrepresentation.
B. Marcy may rescind the contract but may not recover damages because the situation
involved a mutual mistake.