Manuel applied for a variance from the local zoning ordinance in order to build a
building. His neighbor, Sandra, appeared before the zoning board to speak in opposition
to the application. At the hearing, Sandra testified under oath and made several
untruthful statements regarding Manuel’s character which she believed, but which were
not correct. The variance was denied. Manuel is now considering a lawsuit against
Sandra for slander. Does Manuel have a valid cause of action against Sandra? Explain.
What are the elements that he must prove to win a case of slander? What defenses can
Sandra raise to the action?
The court in the case of Alpert v. 28 Williams St.Corp. found that causing the removal
of minority shareholders through a freeze-out merger is justified if the action advances
a general corporate interest.