the bookstore so that she would have more money for clothes shopping and fun
activities. In relation to Credit Card Company B, Penny called up and once again pled
her case as a poor student. She talked Credit Card Company B into taking a used car
with a blown-up engine worth around $1,000 in exchange for the debt. Penny did not lie
about the value of the car, but she made it sound as good as possible. Transfer details
regarding the car were worked out through e-mail. Finally, Penny sent the dive shop a
check for $1,000 marked “paid in full.” Much to her surprise and pleasure, the dive
shop did indeed cash the check. Penny, however, was distraught to find that within 30
days, Credit Card Company A sent her a bill for $1,950; Credit Card Company B sent
her a bill for $3,000; and from the dive shop she received a check for $1,000 along with
a bill for $2,000. Faced with all these claims, Penny decided to look for work. She
ended up two weeks later with a job selling beauty products that she liked much better
than the bookstore job. It did not require dealing with pesky students. Assume all credit
card company representatives had authority to make the agreements at issue.
Which of the following would be the result in a majority of states in regard to Penny’s
obligation to the dive shop?
A. That because the debt was unliquidated and the dive shop cashed the check, an
accord and satisfaction occurred, and Penny owes nothing.
B. That because the debt was liquidated, no accord and satisfaction occurred, and Penny
owes the full $2,000.
C. That in order to satisfy equitable principles, the parties would split the remaining
debt with Penny owing $1,000.
D. That under the UCC, Penny would be required to pay the full amount, but the dive
shop would be estopped from charging any interest.
E. That because the dive shop offered, through issuance of the check, full repayment, no
accord and satisfaction existed; Penny owes the full $2,000.