red light, and strikes a pedestrian. The accident happened despite the fact that Saul’s
supervisor at Incman had repeatedly reprimanded him and advised him to drive more
cautiously. Incman:
a. has no liability, because they did not authorize Saul to drive carelessly.
b. has no liability, because Saul’s actions were not a tort.
c. is liable even though it did not authorize Saul to drive carelessly, because it employed
an improper person as its agent.
d. has no liability, because it has adequately supervised Saul as its agent.
John operates a small repair business and is in desperate need of a certain type of
building material. He obtains the material from a large corporation, but is charged a
grossly unreasonable price and is forced to buy other material he does not need. In view
of the buyer’s unequal bargaining power and unreasonable terms of the contract, this
may be a case of:
a. in para delicto.
b. partial illegality.
c. substantive unconscionability.
d. procedural unconscionability.
The Code has enlarged the common law voidable title doctrine by providing that a good
faith purchaser for value obtains title from one possessing voidable title even if that
person obtained voidable title by: