Arthur negligently stopped his car on the highway. Betty, who was driving along, saw
Arthur’s car in sufficient time to attempt to stop. However, Betty negligently put her
foot on the accelerator instead of the brake and ran into Arthur’s car. If Arthur sues
Betty for damages:
a. Arthur’s contributory negligence will prevent his recovery from Betty in all
jurisdictions.
b. Betty had the last clear chance to avoid the accident and will bear full legal
responsibility for it.
c. Arthur has assumed the risk of the accident.
d. because both parties were negligent, in a state that follows the modified comparative
negligence doctrine, both parties will share the liability for their injuries in proportion
to their degree of fault unless the court finds Arthur’s contributory negligence was as
great as or greater than Betty’s negligence.
In bringing a warranty action, the buyer must prove:
a. whether the warranty was express or implied.
b. that breach of the warranty proximately caused the loss suffered.
c. reliance on the affirmations, promises, descriptions, samples, or models the seller
made or used.
d. All of the above.
e. None of the above.