Myron had two children, Cheryl and Pete, who predeceased him. Cheryl had three
children and Pete had one child. Myron had a will. Which of the following is true?
a. If Myron’s will indicates that the issue are to inherit per stirpes, Pete’s child will
receive one half of Myron’s estate.
b. If Myron’s will indicates that the issue are to inherit per stirpes, Pete’s child will
receive one fourth of Myron’s estate.
c. If Myron’s will indicates that the issue are to inherit per capita, Pete’s child will
receive one half of Myron’s estate.
d. If Myron’s will indicates the issue are to inherit per capita, each of Cheryl’s children
will receive one sixth of Myron’s estate.
In the Tannenbaum v. New York Dry Cleaning, Inc. case,
a. there was a bailment for hire, and the fact that the bailee was unable to return the
bailed item except in a damaged condition created an irrebuttable presumption that the
damage to the item was attributable to the bailees negligence.
b. the court stated that a company cannot, under New York law, use an exculpatory
clause to relieve itself from liability for the consequences of its own negligence.
c. the court found that the claimant was not bound by the terms of the dry cleaning
companys limitation clause because, even if it applied to the situation before the court,
the claimant had not read the clause nor had he assented to its terms.
d. the court found that the claimant was negligent in not reading the limitation clause on
the back of his claim ticket, so he could not recover the cost of his shirt.