A number of the functions of the law can be viewed as being contradictory. For
example, one function is to maintain the status quo, whereas another is to facilitate
orderly change. What other functions could be in conflict with one another? How can
the law simultaneously have seemingly inconsistent functions?
Brittany runs a store called “Miatas Only” that sells parts and accessories for the
popular Mazda Miata sports car. The store purchases parts and accessories from many
manufacturers, but, as its name indicates, sells parts only for Miatas. The store received
a shipment for a large order from Worldwide Sportscar Accessories late on a Saturday
afternoon. The seller had assured “Miatas Only” that the goods were conforming. After
a quick count of the boxes, the store accepted the shipment. The following week when
stocking the items, the following problems were found with the order:
Some sheepskin seat covers were the wrong color. The store had ordered 50 of these in
four different colors, but all 50 were black. The value of the seat covers was the same
regardless of color.
The store had ordered 100 sets of floor mats with the name “Miata” embossed on them,
but instead received 100 sets embossed with “SLK” that were sized for the
Mercedes-Benz sports car of that name. The Miata mats cost the store $60 per pair and
can be sold for $90, whereas the SLK mats cost $70 and are usually sold for $110.
The store had ordered 100 blankets embossed with “Miata” and received the blankets
ordered, but without “Miata” embossed. The plain blankets cost $10 less and sell for
$10 less.
Assume that nonconformity was not difficult to discover. Discuss what is required for a
buyer to revoke acceptance and whether “Miatas Only” can revoke its acceptance of
these items.