The “fraud-on-the-market-theory” used in some cases to establish liability under Rule
10b-5 of the Securities Act of 1934 is an indirect way of establishing which of the
following elements of proof?
A. The defendant acted with negligence.
B. The defendant acted with scienter.
C. The plaintiff’s reliance.
D. The plaintiff’s due diligence.
Daniel is a senior at State University. Brian, Daniel’s father, is concerned about Daniel’s
study habits, given that Daniel spends most of his evenings at the campus pub instead
of the library. Brian promises Daniel that he will send him on an expense-paid trip to
Europe after his graduation if Daniel spends at least five evenings a week studying in
the campus library for the remainder of his senior year. After returning home from his
graduation, Daniel asks Brian about the European trip. Brian replies, “Your education
was your reward. I don’t owe you a trip to Europe.” Brian is:
A. correct; Daniel has already gained the benefit of the bargain.
B. correct; Daniel did not give anything of legal value.
C. incorrect; Brian owes Daniel a trip to Europe because Daniel’s acts are consideration.
D. incorrect, but only if Daniel’s acts are adequate consideration for such an expensive
trip.