Sam is a business executive who flies often in connection with work. After the
September, 2001 terrorists’ destruction in New York and Washington, Sam flew less
frequently. In response to the attacks, new federal regulations made the federal
government responsible for all airport security personnel. In most cases, including at
Sam’s home airport, the government met the obligation by hiring private contractors to
provide the security services. These firms were heavily regulated and controlled by the
government. Also, in the new regulations were profiling guidelines that required
additional security screenings for persons meeting such guidelines. These guidelines
were partly secret, but it was known that members of certain races were much more
likely to fall within them. In addition, on average, six times as many males as females
met the guidelines. Shortly after these regulations were in place, Sam went to his airport
and found extremely long lines at the security checkpoint. He waited in line nearly three
hours. As he was about 10 people away from being screened, an irate passenger,
Marvin, came running through the line screaming that he was about to miss his flight.
Marvin accidentally hit Sam forcefully, breaking Sam’s arm. In addition, Sam had his
pet ferret (a small animal, an exotic pet) in his coat pocket. The impact caused the ferret
to die. Marvin said that the slowness and incompetence of the security personnel had
caused him to “lose it.” When Sam reached the security checkpoint, he was pulled aside
for additional screening. This involved waiting in an additional line for 30 minutes
longer. Sam learned that he had to go through the additional security because he was
returning home on the same day, had no checked baggage, and was male. Sam has sued
both the security screening company and Marvin for his injuries and the loss of his
ferret, and emotional distress related to these. Discuss Sam’s claims, any defenses and
their likely resolution.