Filtration Products, Inc., files a suit against Emmett, its former accountant, alleging
constructive fraud. Emmett may be held liable
a. if Filtration cannot prove actual fraud.
b. if Emmett was grossly negligent in the performance of his duties.
c. only if Emmett acted with fraudulent intent.
d. only if Emmett impersonated someone else who could be liable for fraud.
Lara induces Moe to enter into a contract for the sale of an apartment about which Lara
fraudulently misrepresents a number of material facts. Lara tells Moe that her
commission is 6 percent, but their signed, written contract states “12 percent. The
Statute of Frauds governs
a. contracts that are induced by fraud.
b. contracts that must be in writing to be enforceable.
c. the admissibility in court of oral evidence.
d. the merging of oral and written statements into one contract.
Lively Toys Store and Movin Products Company (MPC) enter into an e-contract under
which MPC agrees to ship a case of electronic, remote-controlled bugs to Lively Toys,
which agrees to pay on delivery. The Uniform Electronics Transactions Act (UETA)