a. no liability to Georgette, because he has not committed a tort against her.
b. committed the tort of battery against Georgette.
c. committed the tort of battery against Michael but has committed no tort against
Georgette.
d. committed the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress against Georgette.
Which of the following is untrue regarding the contracts of intoxicated persons?
a. If an intoxicated person is unable to understand the nature and consequences of his
act, then the contract is voidable.
b. The effect of intoxication is generally the same as that given to contracts that are
voidable because of incompetency.
c. Slight intoxication will destroy one’s contractual capacity.
d. To make a contract voidable, a person need not be so drunk that he is totally without
reason or understanding.
Tunso Corp. has 1,000 shares of stock outstanding that are permitted to vote for
directors. If Tunso Corp. permits cumulative voting, a minority shareholder would need
to vote how many shares to elect one of three directors?