Gail enters into a contract with Hi-Price Appliances, Inc. In a suit between the parties
over payment under the contract, Gail claims that a certain clause is unconscionable. If
the court agrees, it may
a. refuse to enforce the contract, enforce the contract without the disputed clause, or
limit the application of the disputed clause.
b. enforce the contract without the disputed clause only.
c. limit the application of the disputed clause only.
d. refuse to enforce the entire contract only.
USA Oil Corporation signs an instrument that states it is being executed “in accord with
a contract for the purchase of 4,000 barrels of oil dated May 1.” This instrument is
a. negotiable.
b. nonnegotiable, because information about the sale must be obtained from another
source.
c. nonnegotiable, because it states an express condition to payment.
d. nonnegotiable, because the terms of the sale are not clear.
Fact Pattern 22-1