According to the dissent in Casserlie v. Shell Oil Co., an inquiry into a seller’s motive in
setting prices is necessary to determine if the seller acted
A.in good faith.
B.with the motive of driving competitors out of business.
C.with the intent of making the most profit in the least time.
D.to set commercially unreasonable and discriminatory prices.
Fact Pattern 15-1
Bret, a representative of Concrete Products, Inc. assures Dependable Construction
Company (DCC) that Concrete’s cement will not crack within a certain range of
temperatures. DCC uses the product. When cracks develop within the stated
temperature range, DCC files a suit against Concrete.
Refer to Fact Pattern 15-1. The court is most likely to rule in favor of
A.Concrete, because Bret’s statement was an expression of opinion.
B.Concrete, because DCC chose Concrete’s product voluntarily.
C.DCC, because Bret’s statement was an express warranty.
D.DCC, because Concrete’s product is not fit for its purpose.
Brad stands in front of Rustler’s Round-Up Caf, shouting “fighting words” that are
likely to incite Rustler’s patrons to respond violently. The First Amendment protects