A supervening illegality of the object of a contract occurs in which of the following
circumstances?
A) the illegality existed when the offer was made
B) the object of the contract is illegal where made, but would be legal in another
location
C) the object of the contract was legal when the offer was made, but has subsequently
become illegal
D) the offeror had an honest and reasonable belief that the object of the contract was
legal when the offer was made, but later learned that the offer was illegal
E) the object of the contract was illegal when made, but has subsequently become legal
John entered into a contract with Barb to restore Barb’s antique Ford for $9,000.
Because John owes his younger brother a large sum of money, John assigned, prior to
notifying Barb of the assignment, his right to receive payment to his brother. John
began the restoration, but quickly stopped working on the car. Because of this, Barb
retrieved the car from John. Almost no restoration work had been performed. Which of
the following is true in this situation?
A) As a result of the assignment, John’s brother is entitled to payment despite the fact
that John did not perform the restoration.
B) Because of the assignment, John’s brother was responsible for John’s performance.
C) John’s brother does not have a right to collect the $9,000 from Barb.
D) Barb is obligated to allow John’s brother to complete the restoration if he so desires.