Bob, Carol and Ted have decided to go into businesses as a limited partnership
importing and selling exotic spices. Bob and Carol will manage the business and Ted
will have no role in the day to day operations. Bob and Carol contributed have each
invested $500,000 and Ted has contributed the building and land that the business will
be operated from. Alice, a customer, contracts a rare disease from a contaminated spice
sold by the company and sues. Alice is awarded a judgment for $5 million. After she
exhausts the assets of the partnership, having the property and building sold and seizing
all other property, $3 million remains unpaid.
A.Bob, Carol and Ted each owe $1 million and Alice must sue each for their part
B.Bob, Carol and Ted each owe $3 million jointly and severally so Alice may sue one,
two or all three for the $3 million balance
C.Bob and Carol each owe $1.5 million and Alice must sue each for their part; Ted has
no additional liability
D.Bob and Carol each owe $3 million jointly and severally so Alice may sue one or
both of them; Ted has no additional liability
In Texaco Inc. v. Dagher et al. two oil refiners and gas suppliers, Texaco and Shell Oil,
entered into a joint venture called Equilon to consolidate their operations in the western
U.S. Historically, Texaco and Shell were competitors but for their joint venture they
shared expenses and profits equally. The products produced by Equilon were sold under
the brand names Texaco and Shell at a mutually agree upon price. Texaco and Shell
retailers brought a class action lawsuit against the two companies claiming there was a
per se violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act because of the lack of price competition.
The court held that:
A.there was a per se violation because the joint venture was plainly anticompetitive.
B.there was a per se violation because oil companies are automatically held to this
standard.