exeeds $50,000.
c. the case has been tried in two different states with two different outcomes and the
amount in dispute exceeds $50,000.
d. the plaintiff and defendant are citizens of different states and the amount in dispute
exceeds $75,000.
Marla applies for and receives a three-year loan through Sharkey Lenders for $5,000 at
27% APR.If the loan agreement violates the applicable usury statute, Marla may be able
to keep
a. the interest that exceeds the usury limit.
b. all of the interest on the loan.
c. the interest and the $5,000.
d. Any of the answer choices are possible, depending on where the loan was made.
Phillip was waiting for a bus at a bus stop. Across the street and down the block, a
mechanic negligently overinflated a tire he was intending to put onto Marshas pickup
truck. The exploding tire injured Marsha and frightened a neighborhood dog, which ran
down the street and knocked Phillip down, injuring his knee. Phillip sued the mechanic.
In applying the Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. decision to this case, Phillip would
a. win because the mechanic was negligent in overinflating the tire, which led to