Which of the following situations will justify the inference that a price-fixing
conspiracy exists?
A. The defendant’s parallel pricing behavior stemmed from an implied agreement.
B. Independent business decisions by the defendant led to price parallelism.
C. The defendant was unwilling to relinquish market share by engaging in price
competition.
D. The evidence only indicates pure conscious price parallelism by the defendant.
Assume that a state, acting through the appropriate county prosecutor, plans to initiate a
felony prosecution against Joe Beck. Further assume that the state is among those in
which felony defendants may be charged by either of the two methods discussed in the
text. Which of the following is an accurate statement?
A. If a preliminary hearing is held and the judge conducting it concludes that there is
probable cause to believe that Beck committed the charged felony, the judge (who
presided over the preliminary hearing) will find Beck guilty and sentence him
accordingly.
B. If the prosecutor decides to follow the information route to initiating the felony
prosecution, Beck is entitled to insist that a grand jury be convened to determine
whether he should be prosecuted by the state.
C. If a preliminary hearing is held, the state must prove Beck’s guilt beyond a
reasonable doubt in order to carry its burden of proof at the preliminary hearing stage.
D. If a preliminary hearing is held and the magistrate conducting it concludes that there
is probable cause to believe that Beck committed the charged felony, the magistrate
binds over the defendant for trial in the appropriate court.
Which of the following do a certified check and a cashier’s check have in common?
A. The bank is primarily liable on each.