Fred Sweet runs dancing classes for middle-aged and elderly people. Some of Fred’s
customers lack physical coordination, and injuries from kicks, falls, etc. are common.
Fred naturally fears that injured customers will sue him for negligence. Thus, he makes
each customer sign a written contract containing a clause relieving Fred of all liability
for injuries suffered during his dancing classes. However, fearful that he will lose
business if potential customers become aware of his strategy, Fred states the clause in
fine print and doesn’t point it out to them. An injured customer sues Fred in negligence.
Fred wants to defend on the basis of the clause in the contract. Which of the following
is the biggest weakness in Fred’s position?
A. That Fred tried to use an exculpatory clause at all, because such clauses are invalid
on public policy grounds.
B. That Fred tried to use an exculpatory clause to relieve himself of negligence liability.
C. That Fred has superior bargaining power, which makes the customer’s acceptance of
the exculpatory clause involuntary.
D. That Fred used a fine-print exculpatory clause, which means that the customer
lacked knowledge of the clause’s existence.
Anthony, a partner of a partnership firm, was convicted for rash driving. Following this,
all other partners dissociated him from the partnership, as per the terms of the
agreement. This is an example of _____ dissociation.
A. wrongful
B. nonwrongful
C. discriminatory
D. valid
Don is a partner of the firm Shaw Associates, which offers recruitment services. Don
entered into a contract with Bradman & Sons to sell the land on which the partnership
business is situated for $85,000. Is this contract enforceable?
A. Yes, because Don has apparent authority to enter into contract with Bradman &
Sons.
B. No, because Don has only express authority not actual authority.