In considering a covenant not to compete in an employment contract, the court in the
case of Payroll Advance, Inc. v. Yates said in its opinion:
a. in order to obtain an injunction it is necessary for the employer to show that actual
damage has occurred.
b. covenants not to compete are presumptively valid, and they are enforceable to the
extent they are reasonable.
c. the question of reasonableness of a restraint requires consideration of such
circumstances as the subject matter of the contract, the purpose to be served, the
situation of the parties, the extent of the restraint, and the specialization of the business.
d. Two of these answers are correct.
Carl, a contractor, has a contract with Ron, a realtor, to construct a new condominium
complex. The contract provides that Carl must furnish a certificate of occupancy and
conformity with the local fire code before Ron has an obligation to pay. The furnishing
of the certificate is an implied-in-fact condition subsequent to the construction of the
building.
a. True
b. False