Matchless Clothing Company buys clothing assembled by Nantra, Ltd., a foreign firm
that employs young children for long hours and low pay. Nantras nation does not
enforce its child labor laws. Human International Politics (HIP), a political activist
organization, discovers Matchlesss connection to Nantra and plans to reveal this
information. Before HIP does so, however, Matchless publicly releases the information
itself and announces that it is severing its relationship with Nantra. Matchless publicizes
its action in its advertising, and the companys sales and profits increase, apparently as a
direct result. Has Matchless acted unethically in any way? From an ethical perspective,
is Matchlesss conduct in this situation more important than whatever its motive might
be?
During a heated legislative debate, Representative Peony makes a statement of fact
damaging Senator Roses good reputation. Peony knows the statement is not true. In this
situation, Peony is most likely
a. liable for defamation.
b. not liable for defamation because only Roses reputation was hurt.
c. not liable for defamation because Peony enjoys a privilege.