Alice’s Aspirin Inc., produces and packages aspirin for sale to retail stores. Bob buys a
bottle of Alice’s aspirin at Dahl’s Food Stores. Two days later Bob’s friend, Hank, takes
two aspirin while at Bob’s house. Within minutes, Hank is very ill and is rushed to the
hospital, where it is found that a defect in the aspirin caused the reaction. Which of the
following is correct?
a. Hank can sue both Alice’s Aspirin Inc. and Dahl’s under tort theories because he is an
injured party due to the defective product.
b. Hank cannot sue anyone because he assumed the risk of taking the aspirin.
c. Hank cannot sue anyone because he is not in privity with Dahl’s or Alice’s.
d. Hank can sue but will not be able to recover consequential damages for his medical
expenses.
Megan was employed by a large company. Her supervisor told her to falsify
government reports. She refused and was fired. She sued for wrongful discharge. Her
employer claimed that, since Megan was an at-will employee, she had no legal right to
claim the company was liable for damages. Is the employer right?
a. Yes. An at-will employee does not have a legal right to claim wrongful discharge of
employment.
b. Yes. As an employee, Megan owes a duty of loyalty to her employer. If the company
was found to have acted illegally by falsifying the reports, it (not Megan) would be
liable.
c. No. Even though Megan was an at-will employee, such employees may not be fired
without just cause.
d. No. Though at-will employees do not have extensive rights relative to job security,