Would a letter written after the execution of a contract and which contained agreements
different from those in the written contract be admissible under the parol evidence rule?
a. No, because it contradicts the terms of the contract.
b. No, because it changes the agreement.
c. No, because it explains the agreement.
d. Yes, it would be admissible, because it is subsequent to the written agreement.
Some businesses choose not to obtain a patent because it provides protection for only a
limited time.
a. True
b. False
In a Chapter 11 or 13 proceeding, the bankruptcy estate of an individual includes wages
earned after commencement of the proceeding.
a. True
b. False