“Big Spender.” Wally was a partner in XYZ law firm. He decided to withdraw from the
partnership because he wanted to retire early somewhere in the Caribbean. The
partnership agreement of XYZ law firm did not specify the objective or duration of the
partnership. Although Wally gave proper notice, the other partners claimed that he had
no right to withdraw. Wally was angry and decided to get even. Two days after he
withdrew and before the partnership had provided notification to any suppliers of his
departure, Wally went to the office supply store at which he typically purchased
supplies on account for the firm. He purchased several cameras, a computer, and other
items which he placed on the firm account. Wally just smiled when Sam, the manager at
the store, told Wally that he really appreciated the law firm’s business. The next day
Wally headed for the Caribbean and cannot be located. Sam later requests that XYZ
firm pay the bill for Wally’s purchases. The law firm, whose members had decided to
continue the partnership after the dissolution resulting from Wally’s resignation, refused
on the basis that Wally had no authority to make the purchases. Sam says that he did not
know that and that he expects to be paid immediately.
Which of the following is true regarding whether Wally had actual authority to bind the
partnership in regard to his purchases at the office supply store?
A. Wally did not have actual authority to bind the partnership.
B. Wally had actual authority to bind the partnership because the law firm had not
notified anyone at the office supply that he was no longer authorized to make purchases
for the law firm.
C. Wally had actual authority to bind the partnership so long as the purchases were
made within seven days of his resignation.
D. Wally had actual authority to bind the partnership so long as the purchases were
made within ten days of his resignation.
E. Wally had actual authority to bind the partnership only if he cannot be found within
one year of the date the purchases were made.