expenses. Based on this promise, Garrett resigned from his $100,000 annual salary job
at Dab Pvt. Ltd., San Francisco. However, once Garrett moved to New York, his
employment with Ajax was terminated because the company found a candidate who
was willing to work for a lesser salary. Which of the following is true of this situation?
A. Garrett cannot sue Ajax since the promise was oral.
B. Garrett can sue Ajax under promissory estoppel.
C. Garrett cannot file a lawsuit since a promise of employment is always subject to
market conditions.
D. Garrett can sue Ajax, but only for the moving expenses that Garrett can prove he
incurred.
E. Garrett cannot sue Ajax since the reasons for termination will be accepted in court as
legal detriment.
An airline has an opening for a pilot for its fleet of jumbo jets. It stipulates that the
candidates applying for the job must be at least five feet ten inches tall. The airline
states that the aircraft can be safely and efficiently operated only by persons who can
easily reach all of the controls in the cockpit. Passenger safety is the prime concern of
the airline, and pilots must be a certain height to operate the aircraft. In this case, height
is a valid requirement, and using it does not violate the employment discrimination
laws. This is an example of:
A. disparate treatment.
B. disparate impact.
C. reverse discrimination.
D. affirmative action.