California Agricultural Aircraft Services, Inc. (CAAS) is a California corporation
headquartered in Sacramento.
CAAS leases aircraft to crop dusting businesses through California. On October 6,
2006, CAAS entered into a contract with Jinshan Export Company (JEC), a private
Chinese enterprise engaged in the businesses of export facilitation and sales agency, and
Shà nghai Aircraft Company (SAC), a stateÂowned enterprise organized pursuant to
the laws of the People’s Republic of China. The contract provided for the manufacture
by SAC and purchase by CAAS of ten crop dusting aircraft at a price of U.S. $2.1
million, a savings of approximately $200,000 compared to crop dusting aircraft
available from other manufacturers. In order to avoid problems arising from the sale of
Chinese aircraft in the United States, JEC and SAC agreed to fabricate the aircraft parts
at SAC’s Chinese manufacturing facility but perform the actual assembly at its facility
in Mexico. SAC would then export the aircraft to CAAS claiming they were products of
Mexico subject to duty-free treatment pursuant to the North American Free Trade
Agreement. Unfortunately, U.S. Customs classified the aircraft as products of China,
denied the request for duty- free treatment pursuant to NAFTA and assessed the
applicable tariff on aircraft originating from China. How will
U.S. Customs Service and Border Protection determine the country of origin of the
aircraft? What factors may Customs utilize in making this determination? Applying
these factors to the above-stated facts, are the aircraft products of China or Mexico?
Applying these factors, are JEC, SAC and CAAS likely to prevail if they challenge
Customs’ decision?