Jury consultants use mock trials to
a. test which pieces of evidence might be effective.
b. test which witnesses might be effective.
c. test which arguments might be effective.
d. test their whole case.
CASE 2.3
Roberta picks her toddler up at the daycare after she gets off work. The child is asleep
in her car seat and Roberta decides to stop off at the local pool hall for a beer and to talk
to some friends for a little while. She leaves the child in the car while she goes inside.
She winds up staying for a second beer and a couple of line dances. The temperature in
the car reaches 120 degrees and the child dies of hyperthermia. Roberta, though not
very bright, would never intentionally harm her child.
Which of the followings statements regarding Roberta’s criminal liability is true?
a. Roberta is not guilty because this tragedy was an accident.
b. Roberta is not guilty because although she was negligent, she had no criminal intent
to harm
her child.
c. Roberta is guilty because she intentionally left her child in the car and the same intent
applies to any harm that results.
d. Roberta is guilty because she had a legal duty to keep her child safeher negligent
omission resulted in the child’s death.