A) Fair Credit Billing
B) Consumer Leasing
C) Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending
D) Consumer Financial Protection
Ruggers Corp. is a maker of a range of highly popular cruise motorcycles. Tim buys a
Ruggers motorcycle from a dealership and suffers an accident. While recuperating from
his injuries, he learns that Ruggers has recalled all motorcycles it had manufactured and
sold in the previous two years, owing to a previously-unknown defect in their braking
systems. Tim brings a product liability lawsuit against the motorcycle manufacturer and
claims $50,000 in damages. The defect in the motorcycle is found to be half responsible
for the accident, while Tim’s own negligence of traffic rules contributed to the rest.
Under the doctrine of contributory negligence, what would be the ruling of the court
hearing this case?
A) Tim can recover $25,000 worth of damages from Ruggers and the rest from the
dealership from which he purchased the motorcycle.
B) Tim can recover $50,000 worth of damages from the motorcycle manufacturer.
C) Tim can recover $50,000 worth of damages, plus any punitive damages that may be
awarded by the jury.
D) Tim cannot recover any damages from the motorcycle manufacturer.
Which of the following is considered to be a primary defense against Section 7 of the
Clayton Act?