a. The assessment of applicable duties.
b. Disposal of seized goods.
c. Confiscation of goods not allowed for import to U.S.
d. Sale of unclaimed goods.
In Dole v. Carter, the court considered Senator Robert Dole’s complaint that the
president be enjoined from returning the Hungarian coronation regalia to Hungary. The
court:
a. Dismissed the case because it was not “ripe” for adjudication.
b. Enjoined the president from ordering the return of the crown until a formal treaty
could be ratified by Congress.
c. Determined that under existing protocols with Hungary, the crown could not be
returned until the year 2000.
d. Considered the executive agreement to be in accord with an earlier treaty between
Hungary and the U.S.
e. Considered the president’s agreement to return the crown as validly done pursuant to
the president’s inherent constitutional authority (as an “executive agreement”).