22) overbearing, inc., which manufactures ball bearings, has built up a network of
wholesale dealers. under agreements between overbearing and various dealers, each
dealer has an established geographical territory of operation. these agreements also call
for the individual dealers not to compete in another overbearing dealers exclusive
territory. an appropriate plaintiff has sued overbearing on the theory that these
agreements violate section 1 of the sherman act. what treatment will the court give the
agreements? why? under that treatment, is it possible for overbearing to avoid liability
even if the existence of the agreements is established by the plaintiff? if so, how?
23) greg sues ned in an effort to get title to some land claimed by ned and located inside
the state of texas. ned has never been to texas in his life, has never had any contacts of
any kind with the state, and refuses to appear in texas to defend against gregs suit. later,
after greg wins a default judgment against ned, ned shows up in texas to claim that the
judgment was invalid because he was totally outside texas, hence texas courts had no
jurisdiction over him, and for this reason they could not affect his rights to the land. is
ned right? why or why not? assume that subject-matter jurisdiction exists.
24) is the installation of a battery in an automobile subject to article 2 of the ucc or to
the common law of contracts? why?