10) jane wrote a check for $10. she wrote this check in a careless and negligent manner,
making alteration easy. ben altered this check to read $1,000. his alteration was crude
and obvious to anyone paying attention. ben cashed the check at janes bank. the bank
was negligent in accepting this check, but it deducted $1,000 from janes account. jane
sued the bank, and the jury determined that janes negligence contributes 50 percent to
the loss and the banks negligence contributes 50 percent. how much is jane entitled to
recover from her bank?
a.nothing, because she was negligent.
b.half the loss.
c.the entire loss.
d.the entire loss plus her court costs.
11) which of the following statements is true regarding noncompetition clauses in the
employment contracts?
a.these clauses are illegal.
b.employments contracts with these clauses are voidable.
c.these clauses put postemployment restrictions on the employees.
d.these clause need to be ratified by the employer.
12) on may 2, kurtz co. assigned its entire interest in a $70,000 account receivable due
in 60 days from long to city bank for $65,000. on may 4, city notified long of the
assignment. on may 7, long informed city that kurtz had committed fraud in the
transaction out of which the account receivable arose and that payment would not be
made to city. if city commences an action against long, and long is able to prove that
kurtz acted fraudulently:
a.long will be able to successfully assert fraud as a defense.
b.city will be entitled to collect $65,000, the amount paid for the assignment.
c.city will be entitled to collect $70,000 since fraud in the inducement is a personal
defense which was lost on may 2.
d.city will be entitled to collect $70,000 since longs allegation of fraud arose after
notice of the assignment.