1) daniel is a senior at state university. brian, daniels father, is concerned about daniels
study habits, given that daniel spends most of his evenings at the campus pub instead of
the library. brian promises daniel that he will send him on an expense-paid trip to
europe after his graduation if daniel spends at least five evenings a week studying in the
campus library for the remainder of his senior year. after returning home from his
graduation, daniel asks brian about the european trip. brian replies, your education was
your reward. i dont owe you a trip to europe. brian is:
a.correct; daniel has already gained the benefit of the bargain.
b.correct; daniel did not give anything of legal value.
c.incorrect; brian owes daniel a trip to europe because daniels acts are consideration.
d.incorrect, but only if daniels acts are adequate consideration for such an expensive
trip.
2) dan, president of baz co., is happy with the extraordinary performance of naomi, a
baz co. senior accountant. dan informs naomi that because of her superlative work in
the past fiscal year, he is going to give her a 5 percent raise effective next month.
naomi, who has never heard of anyone at baz co. getting a raise, is thrilled and thanks
dan. later that day, dan realizes that giving naomi this raise might cause all senior
accountants to demand salary increases. dan decides not to give naomi a raise after all.
he believes that his promise to give her a raise is not legally binding. dan is correct
because:
a.there was no bargained-for exchange for the raise.
b.of the preexisting duty rule.
c.past consideration is not an act or promise.
d.past consideration is not liquidated.