In the Zelnick v. Adams case, the Supreme Court of Virginia found:
a. the trial court correctly granted summary judgment, ruling the contingency fee
agreement was not binding because Jonathan was a minor when the contract was
executed.
b. the case must be remanded for further proceedings, including the taking of evidence
on the issue of the factual determination of necessity under all of the circumstances.
c. when faced with a defense of infancy, a court has an initial duty to determine, as a
matter of fact, whether the things supplied to the infant under a contract were in the
general class of ‘necessaries.’
d. Both (b) and (c).
A small damage amount fixed without regard to the amount of loss is known as:
a. reliance damages.
b. out-of-pocket damages.
c. nominal damages.
d. None of the above.
A consolidation:
a. has precisely the same result as a merger.
b. is the most typical form of business combination used today.
c. is always illegal (in contrast to mergers, which are legal under state law).