Lucy uses her credit card to make purchases for her new house. She bills a sum of
$2,000 and repays $1,200 within a month. However, she is not able to repay the
remaining $800 for about a year. The debt collection partner of her bank repeatedly
calls her during odd hours and threatens to seize her property if she fails to repay the
outstanding amount along with an unreasonable late fee in a week’s time. In the context
of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), which of the following
statements holds true in this scenario?
A. The act extends only to creditors who are themselves trying to recover money owed
to them.
B. Lucy is not protected under the act unless the debt collection agency uses physical
force on her.
C. Lucy is protected under the act as it prohibits creditors from making contact with a
debtor during inconvenient hours.
D. The act allows debt collection agencies to employ any tactic to recover the
outstanding debt from a consumer.
Cheryl, a human resource manager at a multinational corporation, finds that one of the
employees in the firm had misstated his education credentials. Cheryl can sue the
employee for _____.
A. r©sum© fraud
B. defamation
C. invasion of privacy
D. negligence
Which of the following types of contracts refers to those entered by minors who have
the option, under the law, of either disaffirming or fulfilling most contracts?