The International Court of Justice normally has authority to settle legal disputes only
when nations voluntarily submit to its jurisdiction.
If a contract term is ambiguous, a court can consider extrinsic evidence.
LakesideResort hires Micheline to act as its agent to buy a 1,000-acre waterfront tract
of land from Nabil for $1,000 per acre. Lakeside does not want Nabil to know that it is
the principal or that Micheline is its agent. Lakeside wants the land for a new marina,
and believes that Nabil may not sell the land for that purpose or may demand a
premium price. Micheline makes the purchase, signing only her name on the contract as
the buyer and not disclosing to Nabil the agency relationship. Lakeside gives Micheline
the amount to pay for the land, but she absconds with the funds. Nabil soon learns of
Lakesidesidentity. Can Nabil enforce the contract against Lakeside? Against Micheline?