Unlock access to all the studying documents.
View Full Document
Chapter 18 – Evaluation of Portfolio Performance
1. The two main questions when assessing the performance of an investment manager are: how did the portfolio manager
actually perform, and, why did the portfolio manager perform as he or she did?
2. Investors want their portfolio managers to completely diversify their portfolio, that is, eliminate all systematic risk.
3. A peer group comparison collects the returns produced by a representative universe of investors over a specific period
of time and displays them in a simple boxplot format.
4. The typical proxy for the market portfolio is the S&P 500 Index because it is diversified and price weighted.
Chapter 18 – Evaluation of Portfolio Performance
5. Maximum drawdown calculates the largest percentage decline in value—from peak to trough—wherever during the
horizon that occurs.
6. The most common manner of evaluating portfolio managers is a peer group comparison.
7. Treynor’s performance measure implicitly assumes a completely diversified portfolio.
Chapter 18 – Evaluation of Portfolio Performance
8. A negative Treynor measure (negative T) for a portfolio always indicates that the portfolio would plot below the SML.
9. Sharpe’s performance assumes that all portfolios are completely diversified.
10. The Sharpe measure examines the risk premium per unit of systematic risk.
11. The Sharpe and Treynor measures complement each other and thus both should be used to measure portfolio
performance.
12. The Sharpe and Treynor measures always give different rankings.
13. The Jensen measure requires that each period’s rates of return and risk-free rate be measured, rather than using the
long-term averages as in the Treynor and Sharpe measures.
14. The ranking differences between the Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen performance measures occur because of the
differences in diversification.
15. The portfolio performance measure that can be most affected by a benchmark error is the Sharpe measure.
16. Treynor developed the first composite measure of portfolio performance by introducing the capital market line, which
defines the relationship between the return of a portfolio over time and the return for the market portfolio.
17. The Sharpe measure of portfolio performance divides the portfolio’s risk premium by the portfolio’s beta.
18. The market rewards investors for bearing total risk.
19. The Sortino ratio takes into account the downside risk exposure in the portfolio.
20. The information ratio permits only relative assessments of performance for different portfolios in a style class.
21. When applying the Jensen’s alpha measure, the alpha level and significance can vary greatly depending on the
specification of the return-generating model.
22. The advantage of evaluating a fund’s alpha using a multifactor approach is that it is designed to control for market
style (SMB and HML) and momentum (MOM) risk.
23. Grinblatt and Titman showed that the manager’s security selection ability can be established by how they adjusted
portfolio weights.
24. An advantage of the GT statistic is that it can be computed without reference to any specific benchmark.
25. Attribution analysis separates a portfolio manager’s performance into an allocation effect and selection effect.
26. Funds with low levels of diversification tend to “beat the market.”
27. An appropriate composite risk measure that indicates the relative price volatility for a bond compared to interest rate
changes is the bond’s yield to maturity.
28. In evaluating bond performance, the Barclays Aggregate Bond Index is an appropriate risk measure.
29. The policy effect is a difference in bond portfolio performance from that of a benchmark index due to a difference in
duration.
30. Duration is considered a good measure of risk for a bond portfolio because it indicates the relative volatility of the
bond or portfolio due to interest rate changes and the rating of the bonds.
31. A test of bond performance over time indicated that bond portfolio managers are more consistent over time than
equity managers.
32. A portfolio manager should be evaluated many times and in a variety of market environments before a final judgment
is reached regarding his/her strengths and weaknesses.
33. Two desirable attributes of a portfolio manager’s performance are the ability to derive above-average returns for a
given risk class and the ability to time the market.
34. Overall performance is the total return above the risk-free rate.
35. Normal portfolios, which are customized benchmarks that reflect the specific styles of alternative managers.
36. One example of a flawed benchmark is using the median manager from a broad universe in a peer group comparison.
37. Money-weighted returns set the present value of future cash flows (including future investment contributions and
withdrawals) equal to the level of the initial investment.
38. According to Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS), time-weighted rates of return must be used.
39. One of the goals of the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS) is to obtain worldwide acceptance of a
single standard for the calculation and presentation of investment performance based on the principles of fair
representation and full disclosure.
40. According to Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS), time-weighted rates of return must be used.
41. The CFA Institute encourages managers to disclose the volatility of the composite return and to identify benchmarks
that parallel the risk or investment style that the composite tracks.
42. The major requirements of a portfolio manager include the following, EXCEPT
follow the client’s policy statement.
completely diversify the portfolio to eliminate all unsystematic risk.
the ability to derive above-average risk adjusted returns.
completely diversify the portfolio to eliminate all systematic risk.
deliver on expectations and produce an additional alpha component.
43. The two questions when assessing the performance measurement of an investment manager include:
did the manager follow the client’s policy statement?
did the manager completely diversify the portfolio to eliminate all unsystematic risk?
why did the portfolio manager perform as he or she did?
did the manager have the ability to derive above-average risk adjusted returns?
did the manager deliver on expectations and produce an additional alpha component?
44. Portfolio managers are often evaluated using a boxplot of returns for a universe of investors over a specific period of
time which is known as a(n)
return adjusted comparison.
efficient frontier comparison.
None of these are correct.
45. Treynor showed that rational, risk-averse investors always prefer portfolio possibility lines that have
slightly negative slopes.
46. The measure of performance that divides the portfolio’s risk premium by the portfolio’s beta is the
Chapter 18 – Evaluation of Portfolio Performance
Alternative components model (MCV).
47. Sharpe’s performance measure divides the portfolio’s risk premium by the
standard deviation of the rate of return.
variance of the rate of return.
slope of the fund’s characteristic line.
48. Which measure of portfolio performance allows analysts to determine the statistical significance of abnormal returns?
Alternative components model (MCV)
49. Information ratio portfolio performance measures
adjust portfolio risk to match benchmark risk.
compare portfolio returns to expected returns under CAPM.
evaluate portfolio performance on the basis of return per unit of risk.
indicate historic average differential return per unit of historic variability of differential return.
the average market beta per unit of risk.
50. Relative return portfolio performance measures
adjust portfolio risk to match benchmark risk.
compare portfolio returns to expected returns under CAPM.
evaluate portfolio performance on the basis of return per unit of risk.
indicate historic average differential return per unit of historic variability of differential return.
the average market beta per unit of risk.
51. Excess return portfolio performance measures
adjust portfolio risk to match benchmark risk.
compare portfolio returns to expected returns under CAPM.
evaluate portfolio performance on the basis of return per unit of risk.
indicate historic average differential return per unit of historic variability of differential return.
Chapter 18 – Evaluation of Portfolio Performance
the average market beta per unit of risk.
52. For a poorly diversified portfolio the appropriate measure of portfolio performance would be
the Treynor measure because it evaluates portfolio performance on the basis of return and diversification.
the Sharpe measure because it evaluates portfolio performance on the basis of return and diversification.
the Treynor measure because it uses standard deviation as the risk measure.
the Sharpe measure because it uses beta as the risk measure.
the Jensen measure because it measures the risk-adjusted performance.
53. Which of the following statements concerning performance measures is false?
The Sharpe measure examines both unsystematic and systematic risk.
The Treynor measure examines systematic risk.
The Jensen measure examines systematic risk.
All three measures examine both unsystematic and systematic risk.
None of these are correct.
54. A more recent adjustment to the Sharpe measurement for portfolio evaluation is
to divide the portfolio risk premium by total risk rather than the portfolio‘s beta.
to divide the portfolio risk premium by standard deviation rather than the portfolio’s beta.
to divide the portfolio risk premium by the excess portfolio return rather than total risk.
to divide the excess portfolio return by the portfolio’s standard deviation.
to divide the excess portfolio return by the portfolio’s beta.
55. Which portfolio measurement uses the mean excess return in the numerator divided by the amount of residual risk that
the investor incurred in pursuit of those excess returns?
56. The cost of active management is the coefficient ER, and it is sometimes referred to as
57. A disadvantage of the Treynor and Sharpe measures is that
they produce absolute performance rankings.
the beta and standard deviation are static.
they are both difficult to compute.
they produce relative performance rankings.
they give very different measurements for well-diversified portfolios.
58. The Sortino measure differs from the Sharpe ratio in that
it measures the portfolio’s average return in excess of a user-selected minimum acceptable return threshold.
it measures the portfolio beta.
higher values of the Sortino measure are not desirable, while higher values in the Sharpe ratio are desirable.
it measures standard deviation of total portfolio return.
it measures portfolio beta relative to the market index proxy.
59. Suppose the expected return for the market portfolio and risk-free rate are 13 percent and 3 percent respectively.
Stocks A, B, and C have Treynor measures of 0.24, 0.16, and 0.11, respectively. Based on this information, an investor