8.4 Trade and the Environment
1) Some proponents of trade sanctions argue for changes in policy because they fear low
standards will be used to capture markets and foreign investment. While theoretically possible,
there is little or no support for the view that countries use low labor standards this way, because
A) countries with low labor standards generally have trouble attracting foreign investment.
B) low standards can change a country’s comparative advantage.
C) it is impossible to lower labor standards.
D) countries would not have an incentive to have low standards.
2) One claim that trade barrier proponents use to enforce environmental standards is that
A) environmental standards do not reduce industrial competitiveness and do not induce race-to–
the-bottom, where countries are forced to rescind their standards in order to maintain
employment.
B) high standards in industrialized nations motivates some firms to “export pollution” to
developing countries by relocating their dirty industries.
C) enforcing environmental standards is essential, as there are no differences between labor
standards and environmental standards.
D) all environmental impacts are non-transboundary.
3) The claim that lower environmental standards in foreign countries reduce industrial
competitiveness for high standard countries is on firm theoretical ground because
A) higher environmental standards requirements raise the cost of production to a firm or industry
abiding by the rules.
B) there will be a race-to-the-bottom competition on environmental standards.
C) the interests of firms that are subject to the high standards coincide with the nation’s interests,
one-for-one.
D) environmental standards in most countries have gotten more lax over time.