91.
Explain the Friedman doctrine. Who developed the philosophy? How well
does this approach hold up ethically?
In 1970, Milton Friedman suggested that the only social responsibility of
business is to increase profits, so long as the company stays within the
rules of law. He explicitly rejects the idea that business should undertake
social expenditures beyond those mandated by the law and required for the
efficient running of a business. Friedman does state that businesses should
behave in an ethical manner and not engage in deception and fraud,
however, most economists believe that his approach to ethics does not hold
up well. For example, even though child labor may not be against the law in
a particular country, it is still unethical to use child labor.
AACSB: Ethics
Blooms: Understand
Difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 05-04 Describe the different philosophical approaches to ethics.
Topic: Philosophical Approaches to Ethics
92.
Discuss the cultural relativism approach to business ethics. What is the
connection between this approach and the phrase “When in Rome do as the
Romans”? How well does this approach hold up ethically?
The cultural relativism approach is the belief that ethics are nothing more
than the reflection of a culture and accordingly, a firm should adopt the
ethics of the culture in which it is operating. This approach is often
summarized by the maxim “When in Rome do as the Romans.” Cultural
relativism does not stand up well to business ethics because it suggests
that if a culture allows slavery, then it is acceptable for a firm to use slaves
as well. Cultural relativism implicitly rejects the idea that universal notions
of morality transcend different cultures, however, some universal notions of
morality are found across cultures.
AACSB: Ethics
Blooms: Understand
Difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 05-04 Describe the different philosophical approaches to ethics.
Topic: Philosophical Approaches to Ethics
93.
Discuss the naive immoralist’s approach to business ethics. What are the
criticisms of this approach?
The naive immoralist asserts that if a manager of a multinational sees that
firms from other nations are not following ethical norms in a host nation,
that manager should not either. This approach has been criticized with the
argument that simply accepting an action as being ethically justified just
because everyone is doing it is not sufficient. Moreover, the multinational
company does have the ability to change the prevailing practice in the
country.
AACSB: Ethics
Blooms: Understand
Difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 05-04 Describe the different philosophical approaches to ethics.
Topic: Philosophical Approaches to Ethics
94.
Discuss the utilitarian approach to business ethics. When was this
approach developed? What are its drawbacks?
The utilitarian approach to business ethics was developed in the 18th and
19th centuries by philosophers such as David Hume, Jeremy Bentham, and
John Stuart Mill. The utilitarian approach to ethics holds that the moral
worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An
action is judged to be desirable if it leads to the best possible balance of
good consequences over bad consequences. The best decisions are those
that produce the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
This approach has certain limitations. One serious drawback of the
utilitarian approach is that it is difficult to measure the benefits, costs, and
risks of a course of action. A second problem is that the philosophy omits
the consideration of justice.
AACSB: Ethics
Blooms: Understand
Difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 05-04 Describe the different philosophical approaches to ethics.
Topic: Philosophical Approaches to Ethics
95.
What is the veil of ignorance? Why is it important to business?
The veil of ignorance was developed by John Rawls as part of his approach
to justice theories. According to Rawls, valid principles of justice are those
with which all persons would agree if they could freely and impartially
consider the situation. Impartiality is guaranteed by the veil of ignorance.
Under the veil of ignorance, everyone is imagined to be ignorant of all of
his/her particular characteristics. Under these conditions everyone would
agree that (1) each person be permitted the maximum amount of basic
liberty compatible with a similar liberty for others, and (2) once basic liberty
is assured, inequality in basic social goods is to be allowed only if such
inequalities benefit everyone.
AACSB: Ethics
Blooms: Understand
Difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 05-04 Describe the different philosophical approaches to ethics.
Topic: Philosophical Approaches to Ethics
96.
What are the ways in which international business and its managers can
ensure that ethical issues are considered in business decisions?
An international business and its managers can take several steps to make
sure ethical issues are considered in business decisions. Some of these are:
(1) favor hiring and promoting people with a well-grounded sense of
personal ethics; (2) build an organizational culture that places a high value
on ethical behavior; (3) make sure that leaders within the business not only
articulate the rhetoric of ethical behavior, but also act in a manner that is
consistent with that rhetoric; (4) put decision-making processes in place
that require people to consider the ethical dimension of business decisions;
and (5) develop moral courage.
AACSB: Ethics
Blooms: Understand
Difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 05-05 Explain how managers can incorporate ethical considerations into their decision making.
Topic: Implications for Managers
97.
What is a code of ethics?
A code of ethics is a formal statement of the ethical priorities a business
adheres to. Often, the code of ethics draws heavily upon documents such as
the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which itself is grounded in
Kantian and rights-based theories of moral philosophy.
AACSB: Ethics
Blooms: Understand
Difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 05-05 Explain how managers can incorporate ethical considerations into their decision making.
Topic: Implications for Managers
98.
Describe the five-step process that businesses can use to think through
ethical problems?
Some experts on ethics have recommended a five-step process to think
through ethical problems. In step 1, businesspeople should identify which
stakeholders a decision would affect and in what ways. Stakeholder
analysis involves a certain amount of moral imagination. Step 2 involves
judging the ethics of the proposed strategic decision, given the information
gained in step 1. Managers need to determine whether a proposed decision
would violate the fundamental rights of any stakeholders. Step 3 requires
managers to establish moral intent. This means the business must resolve
to place moral concerns ahead of other concerns in cases where either the
fundamental rights of stakeholders or key moral principles have been
violated. Step 4 requires the company to engage in ethical behavior. Step 5
requires the business to audit its decisions, reviewing them to make sure
99.
Why do organizations appoint an ethics officer?
To make sure that a business behaves in an ethical manner, a number of
firms now have ethics officers. These individuals are responsible for making
sure that all employees are trained to be ethically aware, that ethical
considerations enter the business decision-making process, and that the
company’s code of ethics is followed. Ethics officers may also be
responsible for auditing decisions to make sure they are consistent with this
code. In many businesses, ethics officers act as an internal ombudsperson
with responsibility for handling confidential inquiries from employees,
investigating complaints from employees or others, reporting findings, and
making recommendations for change.
AACSB: Ethics
Blooms: Remember
Difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 05-05 Explain how managers can incorporate ethical considerations into their decision making.
Topic: Implications for Managers
100.
How can companies strengthen the moral courage of employees?
Companies can strengthen the moral courage of employees by committing
themselves to not retaliate against employees who exercise moral courage,
say no to superiors, or otherwise complain about unethical actions.
Companies can also set up ethics hotlines, which allow employees to
anonymously register a complaint with a corporate ethics officer.
AACSB: Ethics
Blooms: Remember
Difficulty: 1 Easy
Learning Objective: 05-05 Explain how managers can incorporate ethical considerations into their decision making.
Topic: Implications for Managers