•
modern world system (MWS)
•
core
•
periphery
•
semiperiphery
•
neoimperialism
Teaching Tips
• We call this perspective “structuralism” because it is the broadest name we could think of —a
big tent that includes Marx, Lenin, Wallerstein, and many others who have a somewhat
similar understanding of political economy. A common theme amongst these political
• One potential problem with using the term “structuralism” is that students might confuse the
four structures of IPE with the structuralist perspective. Despite the similarity in language, we
• Spend some time pointing out the differences between the structuralist perspective and the
economic liberal and mercantilist perspectives presented in the earlier chapters. In some
respects, mercantilism and economic liberalism are direct opposites, which make them
• As noted in the text, this chapter leaves out many of the ideas of Marx and Lenin, focusing
only on the notions that are really critical to an understanding of IPE. It is hard for a person
• Pick a policy issue related to globalization and have students study the issue from a
structuralist perspective. What contributions to our understanding of the issue does
structuralism provide that the other three perspectives do not?