Consider a transnational strategy. Why would a firm choose this strategic
alternative? What are the disadvantages of this strategy?
Firms that are pursuing a transnational strategy are trying to simultaneously
achieve low costs through location economies, economies of scale, and
learning effects; differentiate their product offering across geographic
markets to account for local differences; and foster a multidirectional flow
of skills between different subsidiaries in the firm’s global network of
operations. In essence, a transnational strategy requires a firm to
simultaneously achieve cost efficiencies, global learning, and local
responsiveness. This strategy makes sense when a firm faces high
pressures for cost reductions and high pressures for local responsiveness.
Building an organization that is capable of supporting a transnational
strategic posture is complex and difficult. It is difficult to pursue this
strategy because it puts conflicting demands on the company.
AACSB: Analytic
Blooms: Understand
Difficulty: 2 Medium
Learning Objective: 13-04 Identify the different strategies for competing globally and their pros and cons.
Topic: Choosing a Strategy