Describe the arbitrary approach of conflict management.
In the arbitrary approach, the conflict manager decides which side is right and which is
wrong, then considers the issue to be resolved. Like the democratic vote, this approach
produces a situation in which the losers tend to have hard feelings against both the
winning side and the conflict manager. A skillful conflict manager or arbitrator can soften
the effect of the arbitrary approach by using persuasive explanations.
In a win-win strategy, how is it possible for both sides of a conflict to end up feeling like
winners?
Most conflicts stem from multiple sources and reasons. Because of this complexity, win-
win can be accomplished. The key to the success of the win-win strategy is to satisfy as
many of each side’s needs as possible. People in conflict almost always have more than
one reason for being involved in the dispute, and they tend to attach different priorities to
each of those reasons. They will, as a rule, be satisfied with less than the entire package if
they feel their main goals are achieved.
How would a conflict manager resolve a conflict if he or she is a competitor?
If the conflict manager (who should be neutral) is a competitor, he or she might use the
lose-lose approach to resolve an issue. In this role, competitors are afraid of the disruption
that could result from other people’s conflict, so they work rapidly and energetically to
eliminate the potential disruption.